O
Carrollton
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Automated License Plate Reader (Flock Camera) Program

Carrollton

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (4)Opposed (1)Concerned (2)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Aug 18, 2026.

Public comments (7)

SupportiveConnie NataleAug 18, 2026

Supported police use of cameras, sharing a personal crime prevention success story and noting the strict data retention and access policies governing the system.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 1:40:48 →
SupportiveCharles W. ThrasherAug 18, 2026

Former council member expressed trust in the local police department and supported cameras to protect children and recover stolen property.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 1:44:35 →
ConcernedHannah FaustAug 18, 2026

Raised concerns about conflicting device counts provided by officials and asked Council to end surveillance programs or hold a town hall for public feedback.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 1:37:11 →
OpposedKurt BoothAug 18, 2026

Expressed concern over automated surveillance, comparing Flock cameras to pervasive tracking and urging the city to reconsider its arrangement.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 1:29:30 →
SupportiveJim KleinAug 18, 2026

Voiced strong support for Flock cameras, highlighting their effectiveness in helping police track organized burglars, find lost motorists, and catch drunk drivers.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 1:32:03 →
ConcernedLori FosterAug 18, 2026

Encouraged the city to pause its involvement with Flock cameras due to data privacy concerns and potential misuse, especially given their placement near parks and pools.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 1:33:26 →
SupportiveBecky MillerAug 18, 2026

Former mayor spoke in strong support of the police department and Flock cameras, noting that criminal acts against cameras are illegal and that the technology aids public safety.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 1:37:40 →